Around 1868, the Indian Wars had briefly paused and the soon to be butchered treaties remained in force. However, the US Federal government
and private interests were well aware that the “Indian Question” and “problem
of the savages” was still unanswered. In other words, the “problem of the
savages” was that the savages still existed. Those “savages” had been beaten
back for years by the US regular army but they were not completely vanquished.
In fact, despite being outmanned and outgunned and with little to no
competition for the advancements in weaponry of the US Army, the Native
Americans routinely routed the American military, at times slaughtering whole
detachments.
But now that the secessionists had been dealt with, it became apparent
that it was now time to remove the gloves from the iron fist of the coming
settlements and that the Native Americans had to be annihilated, subjugated, or
displaced from their native lands. Railroads, telegraphs, mines, and the like
were all being hampered by the very existence of Native Americans.
Enter William Sherman, the general famous for his brutal
March to the Sea, the burning of Atlanta, and the destruction of civilian
infrastructure in the US Civil War. Say what you want about Sherman, the man
knew how to win a war. He knew that breaking the backs of the civilian
population and the ability of the society as well as military to sustain itself
was a successful method of warfare. He also knew that the Native Americans
relied upon buffalo for food and shelter and indeed their very survival. In a letter penned in 1868, he wrote that as long as the buffalo were alive, “Indians will go there.
I think it would be wise to invite all the sportsmen of England and America
there this fall for a Grand Buffalo hunt, and make one grand sweep of them
all.”
And so it became unofficial Federal policy that the buffalo had to be extinguished in order to solve the vexing “Indian problem.” Over the next ten years, the buffalo were hunted by privateers, highly encouraged by the US government, to the point of near extinction. Where buffalo once numbered about 30 million, by the end of the 1800’s, that number had been reduced to just a few hundred.
In Andrew C. Isenberg’s book, The Destruction Of The Bison,
Isenberg writes of a reporter who asks a railroad worker, “Do the Indians make
a living gathering these bones?’ Yes, replied a railroad inspector, ‘but it is
a mercy that they can’t eat bones. We were never able to control the savages
until their supply of meat was cut off.”
Fast forward to 2022. After nearly three years of COVID hysteria,
lockdowns, economic disruptions, and schizophrenic government responses, the
United States as a whole as well as the rest of the world is facing a food shortage.
Claims that once belonged only to “preppers” and “conspiracy theorists” are now
mainstream news items, with corporate media outlets reporting that some items
may be in short supply or simply not available at all. All that is necessary is a brief internet search to see
a myriad of mainstream reports of shortages of meat, vegetables, baby formula
and many other staple items. Just a cursory walk around the local grocery store
will reveal a fairly obvious shortage of many items though the pain is now mostly at the point of being an inconvenience moreso than a reason for panic. For now.
But talk of a food shortage is more than scattered news
reports. Even the United Nations is warning of one, but not just in the United States. The UN is warning of a global food shortage. As
ABC News reports,
The head of the United Nations warned Friday that the world faces “catastrophe” because of the growing shortage of food around the globe.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the war in Ukraine has added to the disruptions caused by climate change, the coronavirus pandemic and inequality to produce an “unprecedented global hunger crisis” already affecting hundreds of millions of people.
“There is a real risk that multiple famines will be declared in 2022,” he said in a video message to officials from dozens of rich and developing countries gathered in Berlin. “And 2023 could be even worse.”
Guterres noted that harvests across Asia, Africa and the Americas will take a hit as farmers around the world struggle to cope with rising fertilizer and energy prices.
“This year’s food access issues could become next year’s global food shortage,” he said. “No country will be immune to the social and economic repercussions of such a catastrophe.”
Notice that Gueterres also mentions the rising prices of fuel and
fertilizer. This is something else that is being experienced worldwide, not just
in the United States. Of course, Western media and the ruling party would have
the population believe that Vladmir Putin is hoarding all the world’s gas via
Ukraine, imposing restrictions and taxes on the vulnerable people of the United
States who were on their way to energy independence just three short years.
Now, however, they somehow woke up begging other countries for fuel, licking
the boots of the Saudis, and blaming Vlad for the doubling of the price at the
pump. Clearly, it has nothing to do with intentionally shutting off oil pipelines and punishing businesses and working people on behalf of the climate and faulty notion that man-made CO2 is causing temperatures to rise and the planet to reach a point of irreversible calamity.
Again, however, fuel prices aren’t just rising in the United
States. They are rising across the world along with fertilizer and food costs
and along with the price of just about any consumer good. Inflation too, the
hidden tax that is making itself well known in the United States, is popping up
in the majority of countries across the globe. Who knew printing large amounts
of money would cause that money to be worth less and thus cause prices to rise
to compensate?
Living standards too are dropping all across the world with
polio now rearing its head in the UK again for the first time since the 1980s.
Polio, of course, is a disease that thrives on the low living standards and poor sanitation
of the third world, a world which was partially imported to the UK all the
while the standards of living (healthcare, sanitation, nutrition, etc) have
been gradually eroded. It’s not just the UK either. Living standards have been
falling in the US for decades but accelerating recently. That is, of course, unless one chooses to
believe silly “happiness indexes” repeated out of the UN to promote globalism
and Free Trade policies.
Even basic services are falling apart. Labor shortages from
pilots to the service industry are causing disruptions in the economy, rising
prices, and chaos at airports. All happening globally.
Food shortages are happening globally. Food prices are
rising globally. Fuel and fertilizer are rising globally. Living standards are
falling globally. Inflation is rising globally. Labor shortages are global.
Transportation is falling apart globally. See a pattern yet?
Everything disruption happening nationally is also happening
globally. Are we expected to believe that every government across the world
simply made the same stupid decisions at the same time? That none of them could
figure out the source of the problem? Shouldn't at least one of them have stumbled on the right path forward and lead the others through the mist? Or should we assume that there are more
factors at play here and remember that anytime we see the same thing happening
across the world at the same time agendas that are global in nature
and have no respect for national boundaries are marching forward? I would argue the latter.
Keep in mind, all of these “global crises” came to be out of
the “global pandemic,” itself at best an opportunity that was not allowed to go
to waste. At worst, a global hoax designed to usher in the Great Reset. COVID, after all, is still a virus that has yet to be fully identified in a lab, yet the entire world was locked down at the same time, a prison planet brought in to being, upon this dubious evidence and weak justifications. Regardless, COVID's biggest casualty was freedom.
None of the current crises have arisen on the basis of a
chain of befuddled reactionaries acting in ignorant unison across the globe to
an emerging “pandemic.” In fact, the only ones ignorant of the pandemic and
coming responses were the unsuspecting civilians who willingly gave up their
most basic rights over fear of a virus that has never been isolated in a lab
and still is not able to be accurately tested for.
Still think COVID just surprised everyone in power as much as it did the unsuspecting citizens? Consider briefly how, in the months before the alleged
pandemic arose, a simulation exercise was held at Johns Hopkins Center for
Health Security in concert with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation regarding the emergence of a global coronavirus
pandemic that results in mass disruption of life and culture as we know it,
economic chaos, and disruption of basic services.
As Tim Hinchcliffe wrote in his article, “A
Timeline Of The Great Reset Agenda: From Foundation To Event 201 And The
Pandemic of 2020,”
On May 15, 2018, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the “Clade X” pandemic exercise in partnership with the WEF.
The Clade X exercise included mock video footage of actors giving scripted news reports about a fake pandemic scenario
. . . . .
The Clade X event also included discussion panels with real policymakers who assessed that governments and industry were not adequately prepared for the fictitious global pandemic.
“In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval,” according to a WEF report on Clade X.
“There are major unmet global vulnerabilities and international system challenges posed by pandemics that will require new robust forms of public-private cooperation to address” — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)
Then on October 18, 2019, in partnership with Johns Hopkins and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WEF ran Event 201.
During the scenario, the entire global economy was shaken, there were riots on the streets, and high-tech surveillance measures were needed to “stop the spread.”
. . . . .
Two fake pandemics were simulated in the two years leading up to the real coronavirus crisis.
“Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation” — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security issued a public statement on January 24, 2020, explicitly addressing that Event 201 wasn’t meant to predict the future.
“To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic.”
Intentional or not, Event 201 “highlighted” the “fictional” challenges of a pandemic, along with recommendations that go hand-in-hand with the great reset agenda that has set up camp in the nefarious “new normal.”
“The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering” — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)
Together, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation submitted seven recommendations for governments, international organizations, and global business to follow in the event of a pandemic.
The Event 201 recommendations call for greater collaboration between the public and private sectors while emphasizing the importance of establishing partnerships with un-elected, global institutions such as the WHO, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the International Air Transport Organization, to carry out a centralized response.
. . . . .
One of the recommendations calls for governments to partner with social media companies and news organization to censor content and control the flow of information.
“Media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though [sic] the use of technology” — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)
According to the report, “Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation.
“National public health agencies should work in close collaboration with WHO to create the capability to rapidly develop and release consistent health messages.
“For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though [sic] the use of technology.”
Sound familiar?
Throughout 2020, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have been censoring, suppressing, and flagging any coronavirus-related information that goes against WHO recommendations as a matter of policy, just as Event 201 had recommended.
Big tech companies have also deployed the same content suppression tactics during the 2020 US presidential election — slapping “disputed” claims on content that question election integrity.
Take a look at the predictions made by Event 201:
· Governments
implementing lockdowns worldwide
· The
collapse of many industries
· Growing
mistrust between governments and citizens
· A
greater adoption of biometric surveillance technologies
· Social
media censorship in the name of combating misinformation
· The
desire to flood communication channels with “authoritative” sources
· A
global lack of personal protective equipment
· The
breakdown of international supply chains
· Mass
unemployment
· Rioting
in the streets (see source)
Only the last two are yet to have checkmarks beside them, though mainstream economists are pointing toward September as a possible date for the mass unemployment. Surely, unless there is some inflationary printing by governments, the riots will then follow.
At the core of the COVID scam as well as the subsequent
crises mentioned above is the ushering in of an entirely new society, that
depicted by UN Agenda 21 and the Great Reset, itself the beginning of a global
society reminiscent of that depicted in the Hunger Games.
So what is the Great Reset? Essentially, the term comes from
both a June 3, 2020 event sponsored by the WEF entitled The Great Reset which
featured statements from leaders of the IMF, World Bank, and members of the
corporate and banking sectors of the United States and UK as well as book
written by Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF, entitled COVID19: The Great Reset.
Both the book and the event echoed the same sentiment, i.e. that the world
economy must be shut down and “reset” in order to usher in a new economy based
upon the ideals of Agenda 21 and the Green New Deal.
Hinchcliffe again, in a separate article, “’The
Great Reset Will Dramatically Expand The Surveillance State Via Real-Time
Tracking’: Ron Paul,” writes,
The overall goal of the WEF’s so-called great reset agenda has always been to reshape the global economy and revamp every aspect of society, with or without COVID.
Trust becomes a major concern when you realize that the idea of tracking and tracing every human being on the planet was already championed by the WEF Founder Klaus Schwab years before COVID-19 arrived on the scene.
Another concern is whether to believe that the lockdowns, the limited mobility, the destruction of small businesses, the crashing of the economy, the home evictions, and the largest transfer of wealth in the history of the world are all necessary to stop an “invisible enemy,” along with the subsequent curtailing of freedom that hasn’t been seen in the free world since the beginning of the so-called War on Terror.
“This digital identity determines what products, services and information we can access – or, conversely, what is closed off to us” — WEF report
According to Schwab, the post-COVID fourth industrial revolution will lead to “a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities.”
In his books, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” (2020) and “The Fourth Industrial Revolution” (2017), Schwab envisioned a future of tracking and tracing every individual through digital identities connected to the Internet of Bodies (IoB) ecosystem.
For example, in “The Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Schwab noted:
Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on.
In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.
. . . . .
The digital identity agenda picked-up speed throughout 2020, starting with contact tracing and continuing with immunity passports to monitor and control citizen mobility for the greater good.
After attempting to justify mass surveillance in the interest of public health and safety, Schwab wrote in “COVID-19: The Great Reset” that in the post-pandemic era “the genie of tech surveillance will not be put back in the bottle,” and that “dystopian scenarios are not a fatality.”
Below are just a few quotes from “COVID19: The Great Reset:”
Now that information and communication technologies permeate almost every aspect of our lives and forms of social participation, any digital experience that we have can be turned into a “product” destined to monitor and anticipate our behavior.
. . . . .
The pandemic could open an era of active health surveillance made possible by location-detecting smartphones, facial-recognition cameras and other technologies that identify sources of infection and track the spread of a disease in quasi real time.
. . . . .
Dystopian scenarios are not a fatality. It is true that in the post-pandemic era, personal health and wellbeing will become a much greater priority for society, which is why the genie of tech surveillance will not be put back into the bottle.
. . . . .
The combination of AI, the IoT and sensors and wearable technology will produce new insights into personal well-being. They will monitor how we are and feel, and will progressively blur the boundaries between public healthcare systems and personalized health creation systems – a distinction that will eventually break down.
Hincliffe also writes:
Between 2014 and 2017, the WEF called to reshape, restart, reboot, and reset the global order every single year, each aimed at solving various “crises.”
2014: WEF publishes meeting agenda entitled “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business.”
2015: WEF publishes article in collaboration with VOX EU called “We need to press restart on the global economy.”
2016: WEF holds panel called “How to reboot the global economy.”
2017: WEF publishes article saying “Our world needs a reset in how we operate.”
In 2020, the coronavirus was the catalyst needed to enact the great reset plan that had been bubbling under the surface for years, and immunity passports are just another step in the overall plan to track and trace every citizen through their digital identity.
Without digressing too far, I would suggest reading my
article, “Social
Media, Universal Basic Income, and Cashless Society: How China’s Social Credit
System Is Coming To America,” to see just how far characters like Klaus
would like to drag the world’s population.
It truly is essential reading at this stage of the game.
One of the few statements made by the WEF related to it’s
future goals was a bizarre article published by Forbes entitled, “ Welcome
To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better,”
where the WEF contributor describes a futuristic society (eight years away)
that resembles a feudalist communist utopia where there is no such thing as
privacy or private property and AI runs society. The article is so bizarre
because, while it attempts to paint a utopia, even the fictional narrator can’t
seem to keep from sounding like a brainwashed cult member. It reads
My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.
Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.
All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth. We had all these terrible things happening: lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment. We lost way too many people before we realized that we could do things differently.
Combined with the Social Credit System, UBI, and digital
passports, UN Agenda 21, mentioned above, the next step after the world’s
economic and cultural systems are “reset,” will be implemented, creating what
is essentially a global version of the Soviet Union, gulags and all. For those
who are unaware, UN Agenda 21 is an established and published plan developed by
the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for
Sustainable Affairs. The plan, according to the UN website, is a “comprehensive
plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of
the United
Nations system, government, and major groups, in every area in which
humans have impact on the environment.”
The plan essentially calls for government control of all
land, where human and animal lifestyle and activity is strictly limited and
controlled, humans rounded up into “habitat areas,” and individual rights are a
thing of the past. Travel will be restricted to essential vehicles only and
diet will be mandated by the dictates of the “needs” of the environment.
This is precisely why we are seeing chaos at airports for
lack of pilots, why the supply chain is broken and why food is becoming scarce.
This is not by accident. In fact, food processing facilities have been burned,vandalized, and rendered inoperable all across the United States in seemingly
random acts. But how random are they? Did a sudden mass psychosis take hold
which prodded people into carrying out attacks against food processing
facilities? Or, again, is there an agenda afoot?
Is it any coincidence that the very goals set forth by
Agenda 21 and the Great Reset have been met one by one in the last two years?
- Economic shutdown and “reset” – COVID Lockdowns and furloughs, artificial labor shortages
- Food shortages – disruption of supply chain by lockdowns, labor shortage, “random” attacks on food facilities, destruction of crops, culling of farm animals, rising fuel prices
- Restriction of travel – rising fuel prices, fewer cars functional due to trade disruption, harder to find parts, COVID travel restrictions, vaccine passports, digital monitoring of travel, pilot shortages
- Loss of individual rights – slow burn for decades but COVID lockdowns, vaccine passports, travel restrictions, right to gather all drastically infringed upon under “emergency measures” have eviscerated the concept of individual rights
- Unemployment – global economy already struggling before COVID, after the “pandemic,” however, many businesses simply disappeared
But there is some light in all this. Where many people
simply panicked at the outset of the “pandemic” and willingly gave up their
rights and their critical thinking skills, the subsequent infringement upon
their daily lives for such a sustained amount of time with little to no logical
standards for actually preventing disease, many eventually began opening their eyes to the
fact that another agenda was being put in place. In fact, more people than ever
before have begun to openly question and oppose what their governments are
doing in the name of keeping them safe and healthy.
So, after two years of having their most basic rights
shredded and destroyed, the savages have become restless. They've started to
realize that the treaties of the status quo between themselves and the global
ruling glass were not being honored and so they began to question the
legitimacy of that ruling class. They voted, they protested, they demonstrated,
and refused to comply.
And what is the response of the ruling class? “We were never
able to fully control the savages until their supply of meat was cut off.” It’s
not very inventive but it is effective. So the question dear reader is, if you
are a savage and your meat supply is being cut off, what should you do? Well,
ask yourself what should the native Americans have done? I’ll leave that up to
you but, I think you already know the answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.