Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 30, 2015
Scrambling to protect the terrorists it has funded, armed, trained, and directed for several years against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad, the United States is now openly considering the option of ground troops in Syria. Of course, the term “ground troops” is not being used in general discussion. Instead, “enablers” is the semantical redirection of choice.
Say what you want about the U.S. government - they may be a collection of psychotic murderers hell-bent on world hegemony or World War 3 - but they have one hell of a thesaurus.
Ground troops – sorry, “enablers” – have been active in Syria for some time in the form of Special Forces soldiers taking place in direct combat support missions for terrorist actors as well as in logistical organization and spotting maneuvers. The new discussion, however, is surrounding the open deployment of “ground troops” to Syria under the guise of “fighting ISIS.” In reality, of course, those troops will be stationed in Syria to support ISIS and the alleged-but-never-proven-in-the-slightest-to-be-moderate “rebels” who are also raping and beheading their way across Syria in exactly the same fashion as ISIS.
These troops will be a further step in the direction of direct US military involvement in Syria of the open war variety. These troops will also be sitting ducks and potential “collateral damage” from Russian airstrikes actually aimed at ISIS/jihadist fighters and a potential spark for the powder keg of propaganda that would be launched in the event of Russia “killing our troops.”
Pages
▼
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Hillary Clinton And The Real Issue Behind The Benghazi Scandal
October 28, 2015
Hillary’s track record with Libya is poor to say the least. While Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was ultimately responsible for providing security at the US embassy where the attacks and killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens took place. Considering the outcome, it would be safe to say that Clinton was a failure in her duties at the very least. That is, if we assume the best and give her the benefit of the doubt.
However, while much has been made about the scandal in Benghazi and the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens there, the real story behind the attacks should make Clinton appear much more than an incompetent derelict. In fact, Clinton was anything but incompetent in the Benghazi scandal.
Chris Stevens was merely a casualty in a much broader campaign of arming terrorists in Libya and later transferring those terrorists as well as the arms themselves into Syria via Turkey. The fact that the United States has armed, trained, funded, and directed terrorists in Libya and Syria is beyond question. It is also a fact that the State Department has played a key role in that regard.
This State Department involvement did not begin with John Kerry nor did it begin with Hillary Clinton although it certainly continued during her tenure in office.
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Russia's "No-Fly Zone" Prevents U.S., Israel, UK From Bombing Syria
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 28, 2015
It appears that, after a few weeks of Russian bombing in Syria, a new kind of “no-fly zone” seems to have been established. However, this “no-fly zone” is not focused on preventing Syrian planes and military forces from operating inside the country. Instead, it functions as a barrier to Israeli and American air forces seeking to enter Syria through the Mediterranean Sea in order to support terrorists and jihadists against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad.
This is because of Russia’s Naval presence in the port of Tartus and its new presence just off the coast of Latakia, particularly with ships like the guided missile cruiser Moscow. The ship left Crimea on September 24 and is part of what Russian media is referring to as training exercises.
The Russian Ministry of Defense has stated,
Clearly, the ship is in the Mediterranean for more than simple maneuvers. But its presence is also being bemoaned by the obsessively pro-Israeli, pro-NATO, and pro-war crowds howling in the pages of mainstream media outlets about being prevented from being able to cross national borders at will and rain death and destruction down upon innocent civilians and the primary force fighting ISIS and other jihadists in Syria.
Activist Post
October 28, 2015
It appears that, after a few weeks of Russian bombing in Syria, a new kind of “no-fly zone” seems to have been established. However, this “no-fly zone” is not focused on preventing Syrian planes and military forces from operating inside the country. Instead, it functions as a barrier to Israeli and American air forces seeking to enter Syria through the Mediterranean Sea in order to support terrorists and jihadists against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad.
This is because of Russia’s Naval presence in the port of Tartus and its new presence just off the coast of Latakia, particularly with ships like the guided missile cruiser Moscow. The ship left Crimea on September 24 and is part of what Russian media is referring to as training exercises.
The Russian Ministry of Defense has stated,
In the course of the training activity, the Russian ships will practice organization of anti-submarine, anti-ship, and air defense, as well as search-and-rescue activities and rendering assistance to distressed vessels.
During the exercise, the military seamen are to perform over 40 different combat, tasks including missile and artillery firings at surface and aerial targets.
Clearly, the ship is in the Mediterranean for more than simple maneuvers. But its presence is also being bemoaned by the obsessively pro-Israeli, pro-NATO, and pro-war crowds howling in the pages of mainstream media outlets about being prevented from being able to cross national borders at will and rain death and destruction down upon innocent civilians and the primary force fighting ISIS and other jihadists in Syria.
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
WHO Reports That Processed Meats Are Linked To Cancer
Natural Blaze
October 27, 2015
Confirming what many in the natural health community have known for some time, it appears that the last horse is finally crossing the finish line as the World Health Organization announced on Monday that cured and processed meats such as hot dogs, ham, bacon and sausage are part of a top-tier list of carcinogenic substances.
America’s favorite breakfast foods, according to the World Health Organization are now in the same category as cigarettes, alcohol, arsenic and asbestos. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer is bundling processed meats with the other listed carcinogens because of their documented link to bowel cancer. Of course, we cannot suggest that sausage links cause cancer at the same rate as asbestos exposure, but cause cancer they do.
As IARC epidemiologist Dr. Kurt Straif stated, "For an individual, the risk of developing colorectal (bowel) cancer because of their consumption of processed meat remains small, but this risk increases with the amount of meat consumed."
The IARC estimates that a daily portion of 50 grams of processed meat increases the risk for bowel cancer by 18 percent. Such a portion is equal to about three slices of cooked bacon.
The report goes even further and links red meat to cancer, classifying beef, lamb and pork as “probable” carcinogens placing red meat in the same list as glyphosate. The findings are based on more than 800 studies and is already receiving criticism from the meat industry. Readers might find it interesting to know that the American “bacon craze” that swept the culture – especially via the Internet – was a manufactured marketing play by the industry. It worked, catapulting the processed bacon industry into $4 billion annually, prompting more factory farms.
Monday, October 26, 2015
Scientists Discover End Run Around GMO Regulations
Brandon Turbeville
Natural Blaze
Natural Blaze
October 22, 2015
It appears that the religion of Scientism is finally experiencing phsase 2 of any religion. That phase in which the adherents begin to lose sight of what even the originator or focus of their religion stood for or opposed and now becomes focused on promoting or perpetuating and defending the dogma surrounding it.
The danger and legitimacy of GMOs no longer being in question for those who have latched themselves to the snake oil wagon some scientists and researchers are no longer interested in determining the safety or usefulness of those organisms but attempting to develop means of avoiding the regulation of their promotion.
Research done by scientists at Seoul National University in South Korea, is a perfect example of this. In this series of experiments, scientists are now able to edit a genome using viral RNA in a very precise fashion. The process known as CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) involves the application to a genome using a bacterium as a vehicle. The new process, however, as developed by the Seoul researchers involves the introduction of the RNA to the genome without using agrobacterium as the vehicle. With the new process, the editing of the genome would be the same. In other words, researchers are able to knock out the genes they want to remove. Only the delivery technique is slightly different.
Because CRISPR is traditionally conducted uses a bacterium vehicle CRISPR-modified genomes come under GMO regulations which are enforced by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the agricultural department.
These regulations are applied when a “plant pest” is introduced into a genome that is pre-existing. The bacterium is what is regulated as a plant pest.
The danger and legitimacy of GMOs no longer being in question for those who have latched themselves to the snake oil wagon some scientists and researchers are no longer interested in determining the safety or usefulness of those organisms but attempting to develop means of avoiding the regulation of their promotion.
Research done by scientists at Seoul National University in South Korea, is a perfect example of this. In this series of experiments, scientists are now able to edit a genome using viral RNA in a very precise fashion. The process known as CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) involves the application to a genome using a bacterium as a vehicle. The new process, however, as developed by the Seoul researchers involves the introduction of the RNA to the genome without using agrobacterium as the vehicle. With the new process, the editing of the genome would be the same. In other words, researchers are able to knock out the genes they want to remove. Only the delivery technique is slightly different.
Because CRISPR is traditionally conducted uses a bacterium vehicle CRISPR-modified genomes come under GMO regulations which are enforced by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the agricultural department.
These regulations are applied when a “plant pest” is introduced into a genome that is pre-existing. The bacterium is what is regulated as a plant pest.
Thursday, October 22, 2015
John McCain Leads The Charge To Cut Soldier Benefits; Money For Terrorists But Not For Troops
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 22, 2015
While lawmakers seem to have no problem finding funds for bombs fighter jets and terrorists in Syria and Iraq, it seems that it is much more difficult for them to find money to pay American soldiers for their service and pay for their healthcare once that service is over.
This is because Congressional Defense leaders on Tuesday announced that they are looking to enact more “entitlement and personnel reforms” in 2016.
The bill being submitted and debated by Congress would provide a much lower than anticipated pay raise for U.S. troops beginning in January 2016. It includes cuts in the growth of military housing stipends, an introduction of new co-pays for some military drug prescriptions and a scale-down of the commissary benefit.
The bill also includes changes to the traditional military retirement system and an overhaul of military healthcare offerings like Tricare.
In fact, Tricare “reform” is going to be a major focus in the coming debate. This comes after a military compensation and retirement modernization commission report released earlier this year recommended dumping Tricare completely, “realigning medical commands” and “better integrating Defense Department care with Veterans Affairs medical offerings.”
Pentagon officials despite having an apparent limitless budget when it comes to funding bearded fanatics, and providing limitless amounts of weaponry to terrorists are now whining about the need to “rein in” personnel costs.
Three Day Rally To Take Place At CDC HQ On Friday Oct 23 To Oct 25
Natural Blaze
October 21, 2015
On October the 23rd and 25th, a march, a meeting and a series of events will be held in Atlanta, Georgia, outside the CDC headquarters to demand truth, transparency and respect for individual rights and an end to the agencies policy of making decisions based on politics and fraudulent science.
One of the main points of the rally will be to demand answers from the CDC regarding the 2014 whistleblowing by Dr. William Thompson who publicly exposed research fraud while he acted as the CDC’s senior scientist involved with MMR vaccine studies. The rally will take place on Friday October 23rd from 7 a.m to 2 p.m. at the CDC headquarters located at 1600 Clifton Rd in Atlanta.
On October 24th, a series of events will be held in Grant Park consisting of a line up of a number of speakers and performers including,
- Barbara Lowe Fisher
- Robert F. Kennedy
- The Refusers (band)
- Minister Tony Muhammad
- Dr. Brian Hooker
- Dr. Toni Bark
- Eric Gladen
- Alison Folmar
- Marcella Piper-Terry
- Stacey Francis
- All Stars Blues Messenger
- Lyn Redwood
- Ron Cummins
Truth on the Tracks To Resume Broadcast on November 2, 2015
Due to events, Truth on the Tracks with Brandon Turbeville will not be broadcast over the next two weeks (October 19 - 26). We fully expect to resume broadcasting on Monday night, November 2 at the regular time on UCY.TV.
The network will be playing rebroadcasts of previous shows in the meantime.
Please join us again on November 2 for an all-new broadcast.
We apologize for any inconvenience.
The network will be playing rebroadcasts of previous shows in the meantime.
Please join us again on November 2 for an all-new broadcast.
We apologize for any inconvenience.
As Mexico Weighs Marijuana Legalization U.S. Cuts Aid To Mexico
Activist Post
October 21, 2015
In a stunning move, the United States has recently announced that it is withholding $5 million dollars worth of Drug War aid to Mexico due to repeated human rights violations committed by the Mexican government.
Jose Miguel Vivanco, executive director of the America’s Division of Human Rights Watch described the decision as “unprecedented.” He said that the State Department “has been systematically reluctant to use the leverage provided by law. What they have tended to emphasize is keeping the bilateral relationship as the principal objective, and human rights normally takes a back seat.”
In reality, the $5 million is only a portion of the aid that the U.S. provides to Mexico to continue fighting the Drug War every year. Most of this aid centers around training and equipping Mexican security forces and “strengthening its criminal justice system.”
Under the terms of the Merida Initiative, 15 percent of the funds allocated for Mexican police and military support are supposed to be conditional and tied to improvements in Mexico’s human rights record.
Still, the decision to withhold $5 million is sending a clear message to Mexico.
The question, however, is just what this message might be. While Americans must come to grips with the fact that their closest foreign neighbor is a third-world failed state, it is questionable at best to assume that a State Department that has supported bombing, torturing, raping and beheading across the world in the name of “democracy” is truly concerned with the human rights and lives of Mexicans.
October 21, 2015
In a stunning move, the United States has recently announced that it is withholding $5 million dollars worth of Drug War aid to Mexico due to repeated human rights violations committed by the Mexican government.
Jose Miguel Vivanco, executive director of the America’s Division of Human Rights Watch described the decision as “unprecedented.” He said that the State Department “has been systematically reluctant to use the leverage provided by law. What they have tended to emphasize is keeping the bilateral relationship as the principal objective, and human rights normally takes a back seat.”
In reality, the $5 million is only a portion of the aid that the U.S. provides to Mexico to continue fighting the Drug War every year. Most of this aid centers around training and equipping Mexican security forces and “strengthening its criminal justice system.”
Under the terms of the Merida Initiative, 15 percent of the funds allocated for Mexican police and military support are supposed to be conditional and tied to improvements in Mexico’s human rights record.
Still, the decision to withhold $5 million is sending a clear message to Mexico.
The question, however, is just what this message might be. While Americans must come to grips with the fact that their closest foreign neighbor is a third-world failed state, it is questionable at best to assume that a State Department that has supported bombing, torturing, raping and beheading across the world in the name of “democracy” is truly concerned with the human rights and lives of Mexicans.
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
McDonald’s To Kids: Eat Fast Food Everyday To Lose Weight
Brandon Turbeville
Natural Blaze
October 20, 2015
If ever a massive food corporation had no shame – truly it would be McDonald’s. In addition to paying their workers slave wages, doing everything in their power to milk their employees for time and money, selling some of the world’s worst quality food, and aggressive and shameless marketing strategies (amongst many other negative qualities), McDonald’s is now announcing yet another marketing ploy designed to deflect any responsibility for the quality of its food and for staggering rates of obesity.
Fresh on the heels of McTeacher’s Nights, a program where high school teachers volunteer to work the night shift at McDonald’s for free in exchange for a portion of the profits being donated to the school (a program that benefits McDonald’s more so than the school), one of McDonald’s many “brand ambassadors” is now on the road attempting to convince high school and college students that not only does McDonald’s food not cause obesity, but it is possible to actually lose weight by consuming it three times a day.
To be fair, eating at McDonald’s for most people is a personal choice. (Yes, there are also people who eat at the fast food chain as a necessity.) Regardless, one would find it hard to blame a food retailer or a restaurant for the choices made by individuals. However, it is just this type of aggressive, false, and malicious advertising – along with treacherous business practices – that makes McDonald’s so dangerous and such a poster boy for typical out of control corporation.
Take Iowa teacher, John Cisna, a “brand ambassador” whose time and travel are paid for by McDonald’s. Cisna is promoting his “McDonald’s Diet,” which consists of eating nothing but McDonald’s food for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for 90 days straight as a way to lose weight. His message is that you “can lose weight while still eating the foods you love, like Big Macs and Hot Fudge Sundaes.”
Texas City To Vote On Water Fluoridation In November
Brandon Turbeville and Heather Callaghan
Natural Blaze
October 20, 2015
As anti-fluoride activists are taking to the streets across the pond in Bedford Borough (UK), Texas is witnessing a surge of activism surrounding water fluoridation as well.
The group Fluoride Free San Marcos has organized a successful petition drive to add the option of dropping water fluoridation from the San Marcos water supply to the ballot in November.
There are two propositions on the November ballot.
One has to do with elections and the other involves whether or not to end the practice of adding fluoride to drinking water.
With their success in getting the issue on the ballot, the group is now working to educate voters as to why the issue is important and to why they should de-fluoridate their water.
Sam Brannon of Fluoride Free San Marcos stated:
There’s never been a randomized control-trial on this product they put in our water, they don’t know for sure if it’s doing anything good for us and they certainly don’t know whether or not it is harming us.
Check them out on Facebook.
EU Court Rules UK Secret Court Not A Rights Violation
Activist Post
October 20, 2015
Never known for its respect for human rights and civil liberties, the European Court of Human Rights has once again demonstrated that secret hearings, detentions without trial and other violations of individual rights are well within the scope of the European Union. On October 20th, the ECHR in Strasbourg dismissed a claim by three Pakistani students who were detained in the UK for nearly two weeks while the UK courts held closed sessions regarding their arrest warrants.
The UK courts argued for its secrecy on the grounds of national security. The three students: Sultan Sher, Mohammed Rizwan Sharif and Mohammed Umer Farooq were arrested and held by police after authorities launched a series of “anti-terror raids” across Northwest England in April 2009. All three men were on student visas were held for 13 days. All three were released without charge.
All three students were brought before a court two times during the process in which warrants for further detention were granted. The students claimed they were denied “any open adversarial process” and the ECHR apparently agreed with them. And the ECHR agreed that some evidence being presented against them had been withheld from them. The court also pointed out that one hearing was even held in closed session for a short time.
Still, the ECHR ruled that the UK courts did not violate the rights of these students to lawful detention or in the manner in which the searches took place.
On April 21, 2009, all three men were released without charge, though they were served with deportation orders. They returned voluntarily to Pakistan in September of that year.
Never known for its respect for human rights and civil liberties, the European Court of Human Rights has once again demonstrated that secret hearings, detentions without trial and other violations of individual rights are well within the scope of the European Union. On October 20th, the ECHR in Strasbourg dismissed a claim by three Pakistani students who were detained in the UK for nearly two weeks while the UK courts held closed sessions regarding their arrest warrants.
The UK courts argued for its secrecy on the grounds of national security. The three students: Sultan Sher, Mohammed Rizwan Sharif and Mohammed Umer Farooq were arrested and held by police after authorities launched a series of “anti-terror raids” across Northwest England in April 2009. All three men were on student visas were held for 13 days. All three were released without charge.
All three students were brought before a court two times during the process in which warrants for further detention were granted. The students claimed they were denied “any open adversarial process” and the ECHR apparently agreed with them. And the ECHR agreed that some evidence being presented against them had been withheld from them. The court also pointed out that one hearing was even held in closed session for a short time.
Still, the ECHR ruled that the UK courts did not violate the rights of these students to lawful detention or in the manner in which the searches took place.
On April 21, 2009, all three men were released without charge, though they were served with deportation orders. They returned voluntarily to Pakistan in September of that year.
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
English Town Takes To Streets Against Fluoride In Water
Brandon Turbeville And Heather Callaghan
Natural Blaze
October 20, 2015
The streets of Bedford, England was the scene of an anti-fluoride campaign on Saturday, October 17 throughout the streets teams of activists with Fluoride Free Bedford were carrying clipboards and information packets to educate and encourage shoppers and passersby as to the dangers of forced water-fluoridation and their petition to stop it.
Fluoride Free Bedford has been calling for an end to water fluoridation since 2002 yet their new impetus for action comes as a newly elected group of councilors have taken office.
Cynthia Bagchi, Fluoride Free Bedford coordinator, stated:
The activists are frustrated because in 2011 the Bedford Borough Council voted unanimously to cease water-fluoridation – a proposal that was submitted by major Dave Hodgson. Still, no action was actually taken.
Natural Blaze
October 20, 2015
The streets of Bedford, England was the scene of an anti-fluoride campaign on Saturday, October 17 throughout the streets teams of activists with Fluoride Free Bedford were carrying clipboards and information packets to educate and encourage shoppers and passersby as to the dangers of forced water-fluoridation and their petition to stop it.
Fluoride Free Bedford has been calling for an end to water fluoridation since 2002 yet their new impetus for action comes as a newly elected group of councilors have taken office.
Cynthia Bagchi, Fluoride Free Bedford coordinator, stated:
We want to stimulate discussion throughout Bedford and to stun councilors, to show them the huge amount of support there is from people who don’t want fluoride in their water supply.She also stated:
It’s about educating ourselves and each other. The government isn’t doing it and nor is the counsel, they are just covering up the truth.The water in Bedford borough had been fluoridated for about 40 years but in 2009 the process was temporarily suspended in order so that improvement and repairs could be made on the area’s water treatment plant. Fluoride Free Bedford is attempting to ensure that fluoride does not return.
The activists are frustrated because in 2011 the Bedford Borough Council voted unanimously to cease water-fluoridation – a proposal that was submitted by major Dave Hodgson. Still, no action was actually taken.
Russia Intercepts Israeli Jets; Threatens Shootdown: Report
Brandon Turbeville
October 19, 2015
According to reports by Lebanese, Iranian, and Israeli media, the Russian Air Force recently intercepted Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon near the Syrian border. The reports coming from these news sources claim that the Russians informed the Israelis that they were approaching Russian-controlled airspace and that they would be shot down if they did not change course. The Israelis complied.
The Israeli planes were apparently flying over the Akkar region of northern Lebanon.
Iranian media has reported that the Israeli mission was to spy on Russian ships currently docked at the port of Tartus in Syria.
The Iranian outlet, al-Alam, also reported that the Israelis were attempting to spy on Russian planes flying out of the Latakia air base and to determine whether or not the Russians are providing arms to Hezbollah.
Although in September the Russians and the Israelis reached an agreement regarding the airspace over Syria so as not to experience any unintended clashes between the two air forces, the Israelis have still poked and prodded at the outskirts of Russian-controlled air space on a number of occasions, prompting the Russians to respond by ordering them out of the area.
As Mint Press News reports,
According to reports by Lebanese, Iranian, and Israeli media, the Russian Air Force recently intercepted Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon near the Syrian border. The reports coming from these news sources claim that the Russians informed the Israelis that they were approaching Russian-controlled airspace and that they would be shot down if they did not change course. The Israelis complied.
The Israeli planes were apparently flying over the Akkar region of northern Lebanon.
Iranian media has reported that the Israeli mission was to spy on Russian ships currently docked at the port of Tartus in Syria.
The Iranian outlet, al-Alam, also reported that the Israelis were attempting to spy on Russian planes flying out of the Latakia air base and to determine whether or not the Russians are providing arms to Hezbollah.
Although in September the Russians and the Israelis reached an agreement regarding the airspace over Syria so as not to experience any unintended clashes between the two air forces, the Israelis have still poked and prodded at the outskirts of Russian-controlled air space on a number of occasions, prompting the Russians to respond by ordering them out of the area.
As Mint Press News reports,
McDonald’s Turns Teachers Into Walking Billboards, Profits Off Children And Schools
Brandon Turbeville
October 19, 2015
There are times when a corporation comes up with a marketing strategy that is so aggressive you just have to ask “why?”
Unsurprisingly, this is exactly what McDonald’s has done with its recent McTeacher’s Program, a clever act of marketing that involves enlisting schoolteachers as employees and walking billboards placed in school buildings.
McTeachers “employs” volunteer teachers during evening hours as a fundraising event. Students, parents, and other supporters are urged to patronize McDonald’s on the evenings their teacher is “working” so everyone can see their teachers serve up “hamburgers, shakes, and fries.”
McDonald’s USA claims that schools typically receive between 10 and 20 percent of proceeds toward their fundraiser. Some of it depends on the participating franchises.
This program, however, has drawn the ire of a number of parents, education, and teachers organizations as well as corporate and education watchdog groups. These groups agree that the program essentially turns teachers into walking billboards for McDonald’s and that it promotes an unhealthy diet and consumption of fast food.
Corporate Accountability International and Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood stated:
There are times when a corporation comes up with a marketing strategy that is so aggressive you just have to ask “why?”
Unsurprisingly, this is exactly what McDonald’s has done with its recent McTeacher’s Program, a clever act of marketing that involves enlisting schoolteachers as employees and walking billboards placed in school buildings.
McTeachers “employs” volunteer teachers during evening hours as a fundraising event. Students, parents, and other supporters are urged to patronize McDonald’s on the evenings their teacher is “working” so everyone can see their teachers serve up “hamburgers, shakes, and fries.”
McDonald’s USA claims that schools typically receive between 10 and 20 percent of proceeds toward their fundraiser. Some of it depends on the participating franchises.
This program, however, has drawn the ire of a number of parents, education, and teachers organizations as well as corporate and education watchdog groups. These groups agree that the program essentially turns teachers into walking billboards for McDonald’s and that it promotes an unhealthy diet and consumption of fast food.
Corporate Accountability International and Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood stated:
Despite Shooting Attacks On U.S. Soldiers, Government Says No Guns For You
Amanda Warren
October 19, 2015
In the wake of a number of mass shootings aimed at military personnel, most recently in July where five U.S. service members were killed in Chattanooga, Tennessee, many lawmakers have called for more open rules as to who can carry weapons on a military base. In other words, many lawmakers have realized the danger of keeping U.S. service personnel unarmed particularly when they have obviously become targets on a number of different occasions.
For this reason, negotiators have been working on the fiscal 2016 Defense Authorization bill to include language that will allow commanders of military installations more authority and choice over who is able to carry “an appropriate firearm” or “some personal weapons.”
Lawmakers in support of the new proposed rules have written in a report that “(we) remain concerned about the response times to active shooter attacks on U.S. military installations and facilities. Commanders should take steps to arm additional personnel…if they believe that arming those personnel will contribute to that goal.”
But while advocates of the proposed rules and pro-gun activists and organizations like the National Rifle Association are applauding the attempt, it would be wise not to get excited just yet.
The provisions require the Secretary of Defense to establish the relevant policy by the end of the year. This poses two problems.
In the wake of a number of mass shootings aimed at military personnel, most recently in July where five U.S. service members were killed in Chattanooga, Tennessee, many lawmakers have called for more open rules as to who can carry weapons on a military base. In other words, many lawmakers have realized the danger of keeping U.S. service personnel unarmed particularly when they have obviously become targets on a number of different occasions.
For this reason, negotiators have been working on the fiscal 2016 Defense Authorization bill to include language that will allow commanders of military installations more authority and choice over who is able to carry “an appropriate firearm” or “some personal weapons.”
Lawmakers in support of the new proposed rules have written in a report that “(we) remain concerned about the response times to active shooter attacks on U.S. military installations and facilities. Commanders should take steps to arm additional personnel…if they believe that arming those personnel will contribute to that goal.”
But while advocates of the proposed rules and pro-gun activists and organizations like the National Rifle Association are applauding the attempt, it would be wise not to get excited just yet.
The provisions require the Secretary of Defense to establish the relevant policy by the end of the year. This poses two problems.
Monday, October 19, 2015
Brandon Turbeville Speaks With Daniel Bruno Of The Huffington Post Union Of Bloggers - October 12, 2015
Brandon Turbeville
BrandonTurbeville.com
October 15, 2015
Brandon Turbeville speaks with Daniel Bruno of the Huffington Post Union of Bloggers - October 12, 2015. Brandon and Daniel discuss Syria, war, Wall Street, the Charleston Shooting, MK Ultra, False Flags, and solutions to current situation.
ACCESS THE PROGRAM HERE
BrandonTurbeville.com
October 15, 2015
Brandon Turbeville speaks with Daniel Bruno of the Huffington Post Union of Bloggers - October 12, 2015. Brandon and Daniel discuss Syria, war, Wall Street, the Charleston Shooting, MK Ultra, False Flags, and solutions to current situation.
ACCESS THE PROGRAM HERE
Thursday, October 15, 2015
U.S. Warns Russia Of “Reprisal Attacks” … Russia Foils Attempted “Reprisal Attacks”
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 14, 2015
In yet another “coincidence” that many would suggest is an example of the direct control over international terror networks by NATO and the U.S., only days after U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter warned Russia that it would see reprisal terror attacks within its borders as a result of the Russian intervention in Syria, Russian authorities have announced the disruption of a plot to conduct bombings of Russian railway systems by jihadist terrorists.
Last Thursday, in a meeting with NATO Defense Ministers in Brussels, Carter stated that “They have initiated a joint ground offensive with the Syrian regime, shattering the facade that they are there to fight Isil [Isis]. This will have consequences for Russia itself, which is rightly fearful of attacks. In coming days, the Russians will begin to suffer from casualties.”
While many may have interpreted Carter’s words as referring to the Syrian battleground and the resistance the Russians may face there, others are convinced that Carter’s statement was much broader, perhaps referring to “reprisal attacks” on Russian soil.
Only four days after his statement, Russian police announced that they had foiled a terrorist plot aimed at the destruction and bombing of Russia’s public transport system. The terrorists involved in the plot allegedly received training in ISIS training camps located in Syria and were associated with the ISIS organization.
As the Guardian reported on October 12,
Activist Post
October 14, 2015
In yet another “coincidence” that many would suggest is an example of the direct control over international terror networks by NATO and the U.S., only days after U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter warned Russia that it would see reprisal terror attacks within its borders as a result of the Russian intervention in Syria, Russian authorities have announced the disruption of a plot to conduct bombings of Russian railway systems by jihadist terrorists.
Last Thursday, in a meeting with NATO Defense Ministers in Brussels, Carter stated that “They have initiated a joint ground offensive with the Syrian regime, shattering the facade that they are there to fight Isil [Isis]. This will have consequences for Russia itself, which is rightly fearful of attacks. In coming days, the Russians will begin to suffer from casualties.”
While many may have interpreted Carter’s words as referring to the Syrian battleground and the resistance the Russians may face there, others are convinced that Carter’s statement was much broader, perhaps referring to “reprisal attacks” on Russian soil.
Only four days after his statement, Russian police announced that they had foiled a terrorist plot aimed at the destruction and bombing of Russia’s public transport system. The terrorists involved in the plot allegedly received training in ISIS training camps located in Syria and were associated with the ISIS organization.
As the Guardian reported on October 12,
Information about the alleged terrorists remained murky on Monday evening. An official statement from the FSB said only that a raid had taken place on an apartment where between six and 11 people lived, “some of whom have been through combat training in Islamic State camps in Syria.” The FSB said they were all Russian citizens.
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Syrians Stand With Russia As America’s “Moderate Rebels” Bomb Civilians
Afraa Dagher
October, 2015
Shells hit the ground outside the Russian embassy in Damascus on Tuesday, October 10, 2015. It was clearly an attempt to terrorize the Syrian people who had gathered in a rally to express their support for the coordination between Russia and Syria against terrorists fighting in Syria.
The terrorists on the ground in Syria represent a global threat and Syrians recognize that the military coordination with Russia is the only solution to that threat.
Let me again be clear – Syrians welcome Moscow’s airstrikes on terrorists in Syria.
This includes the so-called “moderate rebels.”
The foreign-backed “moderate rebels” are incapable of allowing others the freedom to choose their own way to live. Instead, they bomb Syrians to get their message across. This is the only language the “moderate rebels” understand.
For instance, during the elections, Syrians went to the ballot box under missiles rained down upon them by “moderate rebels” who are peaceful seekers of democracy, at least as they are presented on mainstream media outlets in the West.
In this latest “moderate” attack, we are thankful that no member of the diplomatic mission was hurt.
Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister stated, “It’s a blatant act of terror meant to scare those who support the battle against terrorism,” according to RT.
Shells hit the ground outside the Russian embassy in Damascus on Tuesday, October 10, 2015. It was clearly an attempt to terrorize the Syrian people who had gathered in a rally to express their support for the coordination between Russia and Syria against terrorists fighting in Syria.
The terrorists on the ground in Syria represent a global threat and Syrians recognize that the military coordination with Russia is the only solution to that threat.
Let me again be clear – Syrians welcome Moscow’s airstrikes on terrorists in Syria.
This includes the so-called “moderate rebels.”
The foreign-backed “moderate rebels” are incapable of allowing others the freedom to choose their own way to live. Instead, they bomb Syrians to get their message across. This is the only language the “moderate rebels” understand.
For instance, during the elections, Syrians went to the ballot box under missiles rained down upon them by “moderate rebels” who are peaceful seekers of democracy, at least as they are presented on mainstream media outlets in the West.
In this latest “moderate” attack, we are thankful that no member of the diplomatic mission was hurt.
Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister stated, “It’s a blatant act of terror meant to scare those who support the battle against terrorism,” according to RT.
Hillary Clinton: The Killing Of Ghaddafi And The Destruction Of Libya
Brandon Turbeville
October 13, 2015
While Clinton’s demented reaction to Ghaddafi’s death was revealing, her actual contribution to it was not only immoral and illegal, it was treasonous.
While Clinton’s demented reaction to Ghaddafi’s death was revealing, her actual contribution to it was not only immoral and illegal, it was treasonous.
Remember, it was Hillary Clinton, along with her State Department staff such as Susan Rice and Victoria Nuland who were out in front building up the case for war against Libya, a “UN Resolution," and support for the terrorists attempting to overthrow the Libyan leader.
In fact, in an article entitled “Hillary’s War: How Conviction Replaced Skepticism In Libya Intervention,” the Washington Post’s Joby Warrick describes how Clinton provided yeomen’s service in the effort to build an “international coalition” against Libya and Ghaddafi and how she worked overtime to see to it that the nation with the highest living standards in Africa was reduced to a burning desert of rubble and savagery.[1]
Even the Huffington Post was forced to admit that Hillary Clinton was one of the main forces promoting the war in Libya, while also fairly pointing out that Clinton was one of many in the US State Department and other governing bodies who supported the same.[2]
Clinton would stop at no lengths to push the United States into yet another war. Clinton would even go so far as to give support to the propaganda line that Ghaddafi was using rape and sexual violence to intimidate and oppress Libyan women.[3]
Even the Huffington Post was forced to admit that Hillary Clinton was one of the main forces promoting the war in Libya, while also fairly pointing out that Clinton was one of many in the US State Department and other governing bodies who supported the same.[2]
Clinton would stop at no lengths to push the United States into yet another war. Clinton would even go so far as to give support to the propaganda line that Ghaddafi was using rape and sexual violence to intimidate and oppress Libyan women.[3]
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
As Russia Bombs ISIS, US Bombs Syrian Civilian Power Stations
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 12, 2015
In yet another telling episode, the United States has again demonstrated its true position in regards to ISIS and the Russian bombing of the terrorist organization.
As Russian forces drop bombs and missiles on top of ISIS fighters all across Syria, lobbing cruise missiles from the Caspian, regular sortie missions, and combat helicopter attacks against ISIS and other “relatively moderate” cannibals and terrorists, the United States launched a bombing mission of its own against two power plants Aleppo.
The power plants were located in al-Rudwaniya east of Aleppo and resulted in power outages affecting the Syrian people, adding to the American tradition of bombing civilian infrastructure instead of ISIS and other terrorist targets in Syria. The power outages only further contribute to the misery surrounding the people of Aleppo who have been bombarding by barbarians funded by the United States and NATO, intent of raping and beheading their way through the city and declaring their caliphate of pre-civilization on civilized people.
It should also be noted that the US bombing campaign is a violation of international law, unlike the Russian campaign where Russian forces were invited in to the country by the legitimate government.
The United States has long maintained that its bombing campaign was directed at ISIS but, to date, very little damage has been done to ISIS structures, facilities, or personnel by any American airstrikes. Only when ISIS fighters are threatening a Western interest (i.e. an oil well owned by a Western company) or when NATO has been unable to simply redirect ISIS forces via embedded or proxy commanders do terrorists actually find themselves bombarded by what is, in reality, an act of “death squad herding.”
Activist Post
October 12, 2015
In yet another telling episode, the United States has again demonstrated its true position in regards to ISIS and the Russian bombing of the terrorist organization.
As Russian forces drop bombs and missiles on top of ISIS fighters all across Syria, lobbing cruise missiles from the Caspian, regular sortie missions, and combat helicopter attacks against ISIS and other “relatively moderate” cannibals and terrorists, the United States launched a bombing mission of its own against two power plants Aleppo.
The power plants were located in al-Rudwaniya east of Aleppo and resulted in power outages affecting the Syrian people, adding to the American tradition of bombing civilian infrastructure instead of ISIS and other terrorist targets in Syria. The power outages only further contribute to the misery surrounding the people of Aleppo who have been bombarding by barbarians funded by the United States and NATO, intent of raping and beheading their way through the city and declaring their caliphate of pre-civilization on civilized people.
It should also be noted that the US bombing campaign is a violation of international law, unlike the Russian campaign where Russian forces were invited in to the country by the legitimate government.
The United States has long maintained that its bombing campaign was directed at ISIS but, to date, very little damage has been done to ISIS structures, facilities, or personnel by any American airstrikes. Only when ISIS fighters are threatening a Western interest (i.e. an oil well owned by a Western company) or when NATO has been unable to simply redirect ISIS forces via embedded or proxy commanders do terrorists actually find themselves bombarded by what is, in reality, an act of “death squad herding.”
Truth on the Tracks with Brandon Turbeville - October 13, 2015
Truth on the Tracks with Brandon Turbeville - October 13, 2015
Brandon discusses the possibility that Turkey has shot down a Russian jet, the Syrian crisis, the potential for WW3, and the history of Uyghur terror. Brandon also runs down the list of reasons why Russia cares so much about Syria.
ACCESS THE PROGRAM HERE
ACCESS THE TRUTH ON THE TRACKS ARCHIVES HERE
Brandon discusses the possibility that Turkey has shot down a Russian jet, the Syrian crisis, the potential for WW3, and the history of Uyghur terror. Brandon also runs down the list of reasons why Russia cares so much about Syria.
ACCESS THE PROGRAM HERE
ACCESS THE TRUTH ON THE TRACKS ARCHIVES HERE
Friday, October 9, 2015
Brzezinski’s “Retaliation” Agenda: Break Up Russia And Absorb It
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 9, 2015
When the dark lord of the Anglo-American empire, Zbigniew Brzezinski, stated that the United States should retaliate against Russia as a result of the latter ruining the former’s credibility in the Middle East (which the U.S. needed no help in doing), the world got a glimpse into just how far the ruling elite is willing to take the world’s population in its quest for total hegemony.
After all, Brzezinski is no mere talking head or media mouthpiece. He is the architect of al-Qaeda and controller of much of the American geopolitical strategy. When he states that retaliation must be part of U.S. strategy, there is a very real possibility that it will be.
Indeed, in order to understand much of the U.S. geopolitical strategy at work today, it might serve us well to consult the work Brzezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives.
It should be remembered that it was in this very book that Brzezinski uttered the famous statement that “America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being.”[1]
The book, written in 1997, seemed to lament the fact that the public would not support such blatant imperialism unless they truly viewed the crusade to be in their own immediate self-interest. Only fours year later, the public would receive such a “sudden threat or challenge” to their “sense of domestic well-being” in the form of the 9/11 attacks.
Activist Post
October 9, 2015
When the dark lord of the Anglo-American empire, Zbigniew Brzezinski, stated that the United States should retaliate against Russia as a result of the latter ruining the former’s credibility in the Middle East (which the U.S. needed no help in doing), the world got a glimpse into just how far the ruling elite is willing to take the world’s population in its quest for total hegemony.
After all, Brzezinski is no mere talking head or media mouthpiece. He is the architect of al-Qaeda and controller of much of the American geopolitical strategy. When he states that retaliation must be part of U.S. strategy, there is a very real possibility that it will be.
Indeed, in order to understand much of the U.S. geopolitical strategy at work today, it might serve us well to consult the work Brzezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives.
It should be remembered that it was in this very book that Brzezinski uttered the famous statement that “America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being.”[1]
The book, written in 1997, seemed to lament the fact that the public would not support such blatant imperialism unless they truly viewed the crusade to be in their own immediate self-interest. Only fours year later, the public would receive such a “sudden threat or challenge” to their “sense of domestic well-being” in the form of the 9/11 attacks.
Hillary Clinton: We Came. We Saw. He Died.
Brandon Turbeville
Brandon Turbeville's new book, The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President is available in three different formats: Hardcopy (available here), Amazon Kindle for only .99 (available here), and a Free PDF Format (accessible free from his website,BrandonTurbeville.com).
October 2, 2015
Perhaps one of the most sadistic and psychopathic displays of an American official, Hillary Clinton’s cackling response to a question regarding the death of Ghaddafi and the US role in the destruction of Libya certainly deserves honorable mention.[1]
Clinton’s remark was a paraphrase of a quote from Julius Caesar after he concluded his war with Pharnaces II of Pontus: “Veni, vidi, vici” (“I came, I saw, I conquered’).[2]
Ghaddafi’s murder had just taken place with the Libyan leader – a true leader in the fight against Islamic terrorism and who had increased the living standards of the average Libyan to some of the highest in Africa – being sodomized with a bayonet, beaten, and eventually executed.[3]
The statement, along with her signature cackle revealed the depths of depravity in which Clinton dwells as well as a glimpse of her obvious psychosis and psychopathy.[4]
Please see the video at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y
Perhaps one of the most sadistic and psychopathic displays of an American official, Hillary Clinton’s cackling response to a question regarding the death of Ghaddafi and the US role in the destruction of Libya certainly deserves honorable mention.[1]
Clinton’s remark was a paraphrase of a quote from Julius Caesar after he concluded his war with Pharnaces II of Pontus: “Veni, vidi, vici” (“I came, I saw, I conquered’).[2]
Ghaddafi’s murder had just taken place with the Libyan leader – a true leader in the fight against Islamic terrorism and who had increased the living standards of the average Libyan to some of the highest in Africa – being sodomized with a bayonet, beaten, and eventually executed.[3]
The statement, along with her signature cackle revealed the depths of depravity in which Clinton dwells as well as a glimpse of her obvious psychosis and psychopathy.[4]
Please see the video at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y
Brandon Turbeville's new book, The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President is available in three different formats: Hardcopy (available here), Amazon Kindle for only .99 (available here), and a Free PDF Format (accessible free from his website,BrandonTurbeville.com).
Thursday, October 8, 2015
Brzezinski Calls For ‘Retaliation’ Against Russia For Fighting ISIS
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 6, 2015
The leading anti-Russian figure of the Anglo-American establishment and geopolitical chess player, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has recently declared in an op-ed for the Financial Times that the United States should “retaliate” against Russia for its actions in Syria, even going so far as military action to do so.
Brzezinski argues that the recent Russian involvement in Syria puts American credibility and global reputation at stake and suggests that such a situation is intolerable. Brzezinski wrote that Russian attacks against what he and the U.S. State Department have labeled as the “non-ISIS” targets and “rebels backed by the United States” at best reflects “Russian military incompetence” and at worst signals “evidence of a dangerous desire to highlight American political impotence.”
"In these rapidly unfolding circumstances the U.S. has only one real option if it is to protect its wider stakes in the region: to convey to Moscow the demand that it cease and desist from military actions that directly affect American assets," he wrote.
"But, better still, Russia might be persuaded to act with the U.S. in seeking a wider accommodation to a regional problem that transcends the interests of a single state," he added later.
Brzezinski hinted that Russia was engaged in a “new form of neocolonial domination” and offered up his assessment of the geopolitical situation when he stated
Activist Post
October 6, 2015
The leading anti-Russian figure of the Anglo-American establishment and geopolitical chess player, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has recently declared in an op-ed for the Financial Times that the United States should “retaliate” against Russia for its actions in Syria, even going so far as military action to do so.
Brzezinski argues that the recent Russian involvement in Syria puts American credibility and global reputation at stake and suggests that such a situation is intolerable. Brzezinski wrote that Russian attacks against what he and the U.S. State Department have labeled as the “non-ISIS” targets and “rebels backed by the United States” at best reflects “Russian military incompetence” and at worst signals “evidence of a dangerous desire to highlight American political impotence.”
"In these rapidly unfolding circumstances the U.S. has only one real option if it is to protect its wider stakes in the region: to convey to Moscow the demand that it cease and desist from military actions that directly affect American assets," he wrote.
"But, better still, Russia might be persuaded to act with the U.S. in seeking a wider accommodation to a regional problem that transcends the interests of a single state," he added later.
Brzezinski hinted that Russia was engaged in a “new form of neocolonial domination” and offered up his assessment of the geopolitical situation when he stated
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
Has Russia Declared A “No-Float Zone” In Syria?
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
October 6, 2015
While brazen psychopaths like Hillary Clinton and warmongers like Marco Rubio call for a No-Fly Zone in Syria, it appears that Russia has declared a “No-Go Zone” of its own. The Russian version, however, consists of a “No-Float Zone” and is located off the coast of Syria.
The “No-Float Zone” as Ziad Fadel of Syrian Perspective has labeled it, is focused on the Mediterranean sea, with ships already within the vicinity of the Mediterranean preparing to meet with those currently based in the Black Sea but who are now heading into the Mediterranean. Both ships and reconnaissance vessels are reportedly prepared to establish a “No-Float Zone” to serve as protection for approximately 140,000 Russian troops that appear to be heading to Syria.
Fadel reports,
Officially, Russia has not announced the troop movement. However, unofficially, it is appears that troop movements are being prepared. For instance, Sputnik recently reported that Putin has signed an order to draft over 147,000 soldiers into the Russian military.
Activist Post
October 6, 2015
While brazen psychopaths like Hillary Clinton and warmongers like Marco Rubio call for a No-Fly Zone in Syria, it appears that Russia has declared a “No-Go Zone” of its own. The Russian version, however, consists of a “No-Float Zone” and is located off the coast of Syria.
The “No-Float Zone” as Ziad Fadel of Syrian Perspective has labeled it, is focused on the Mediterranean sea, with ships already within the vicinity of the Mediterranean preparing to meet with those currently based in the Black Sea but who are now heading into the Mediterranean. Both ships and reconnaissance vessels are reportedly prepared to establish a “No-Float Zone” to serve as protection for approximately 140,000 Russian troops that appear to be heading to Syria.
Fadel reports,
Russian warships and reconnaissance vessels are speeding out of the Black Sea into the Mediterranean as I write. The ships will establish a no float zone for any ships trying to interdict the arrival of over 140,000 Russian soldiers at the ports of Tartous and Latakia. Moreover, it appears Russian aircraft are increasing sorties over Syria and have crossed the border into Turkey in pursuit of Erdoghan’s murderous criminals. The decision to increase Russia’s role in the conflict was not made yesterday, as Waleed Mu’allim, Syria’s Foreign Minister, stated in an interview. This was, as I reported, a plan that had been drawn up by General Gerasimov and his assistants years ago. The only impediments were Syria’s obsession with keeping foreign boots off Syrian soil and the assurances from Syrian Army generals that the war would be over by now without foreign intervention. Dr. Assad has made the intelligent and courageous decision to set aside Ba’athist fears of occupation and bring Russia fully into the conflict.
Officially, Russia has not announced the troop movement. However, unofficially, it is appears that troop movements are being prepared. For instance, Sputnik recently reported that Putin has signed an order to draft over 147,000 soldiers into the Russian military.
Effort To Recall Vaccine Senator Pan Underway In California
Brandon Turbeville
Natural Blaze
October 6, 2015
Even though the effort to repeal S.B. 277 in California has officially failed, possibly due to what many suggest may have been a concerted act at sabotage, another “repeal” effort is taking place in the golden state. This time, however, it is not a bill that is the target, but a senator.
California Senator Pan, one of the main sponsors of S.B. 277, is now facing a recall effort begun at the grassroots level by a number of California citizens who find his corporate pandering, political corruption, and violation of parental rights to no longer be tolerable.
The website, RecallPan.com, as well as the movement, is made up of a number of diverse individuals and groups that oppose Pan for very diverse reasons, all united for the purpose of seeing the corporate Senator removed from the position that he has so blatantly abused.
RecallPan writes,
Natural Blaze
October 6, 2015
Even though the effort to repeal S.B. 277 in California has officially failed, possibly due to what many suggest may have been a concerted act at sabotage, another “repeal” effort is taking place in the golden state. This time, however, it is not a bill that is the target, but a senator.
California Senator Pan, one of the main sponsors of S.B. 277, is now facing a recall effort begun at the grassroots level by a number of California citizens who find his corporate pandering, political corruption, and violation of parental rights to no longer be tolerable.
The website, RecallPan.com, as well as the movement, is made up of a number of diverse individuals and groups that oppose Pan for very diverse reasons, all united for the purpose of seeing the corporate Senator removed from the position that he has so blatantly abused.
RecallPan writes,
The Recall Pan Campaign is grassroots and non partisan, and is comprised of Californians from all walks of life. It is a diverse group, that spans many different political affiliations, religions, and professions. This diverse group came together to remove Senator Richard Pan, as we feel he is no longer qualified to represent this District, or the State of California.